Copy and paste does not negate the need for System 2 thinking which is the conscious and logical thinking instead of the subconscious and automatic thinking. Follow through with a visual check to pick up errors. Saving a few minutes in tedious work is good as long as it doesn’t cause hours of troubleshooting later. A cool feature like this Alt-key highlighting might feed the problem.Īs such, practice caution. Several articles on programming cover the ‘copy and paste’ issues in depth. ‘Copy and paste’ ( Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V) is a large source of PLC program bugs and errors. SCA to variables shared with a SCADA system. Adding a prefix to a mirror set of variables- e.g.Change user defined data type names on a set of assignments.This is useful for common parts of a variable name, like above. Highlighting multiple variables verticallyĬhanging the word ‘Read’ to ‘Write’ can be done in one quick update for the entire list: Type out replacement for highlighted variable Holding down the Alt key allows for a vertical highlighting feature. One of them noted a CODESYS tip/trick to change the variable name prefixes or suffixes that will save programmers a lot of time and tedious work. Some of the guys at the office just got back from a SoMachine Motion CODESYS session in Germany. If there is a point to be made for any of these selections, submit your thoughts in the comments section below. Then there is a part of the community who ( for various reasons) will be using ladder logic. There are going to be programmers who use SFC for state diagrams. The frame of one might look like follows: Frame of a State Diagram with a CASE Structure in ST What would a CASE structure for a Multi-State PLC Program Look Like? It also will cover better analytics and data handling in PLC’s with the usage of arrays. It helps speed up troubleshooting and development of PLC programs. Moving forward, a mixed programming language approach is best. The preference for ladder ( besides the above points) is also strongly tied to the way one of the major PLC programming platform is/was structured. However, all facts considered, it is not the best for organizing a state based system. Also, it is relatively easy for maintenance personnel to work with it. Ladder diagrams have been around for a long time which has led to much bias towards it. There is much confusion on the internet and probably in perception among PLC programmers about which language is best for a step/state based program. This helps maintenance folks provide the first line of troubleshooting by checking I/O statuses.The main program operation can be written with the step/state based Sequential Function Chart. The I/O interface can be written in ladder diagram. One of the benefits of the 61131-3 standard is that each program organization unit can be written in a different language. This does not mean that the entire program has to be in Structured Text another sequence when an analog input goes below a threshold. ![]() a different sequence when a jam is detected.one sequence for when there is a power loss condition.Any state can be transitioned to any other state and vice versa.Įxample: Some systems require for one state to be able to transition to multiple other options for states.Įxample: While running, a machine has to operate several different sequences:.This is unlike the ladder diagram environment where a rung is within the execution path even if the logic within it is not currently active. When one state executes, all other states do not.We shall examine this in a little more depth. Having said that, if you are to build a sequence with a point -to-multipoint state diagram, a CASE structure in Structured Text is probably the most effective way to do it. The standard also specifies Sequential Function Chart as the environment to organize a PLC program. Also, the ability to have multiple tasks helps organize the sequence of the execution of program units. It defines the ability to ‘divide and conquer’ a larger system down to individual program units ( program organization units or POU’s in 61131-3 lingo). The IEC61131-3 software model helps the organization and sequencing. IEC61131-3 helps with organizing PLC programs It also helps with readability and maintainability of a program. This statement is specifically true for PLC programs that need to handle a state -to-multi-state system. The benefit of good state-based organization makes troubleshooting easier. One of the best ways is using a CASE structure in Structured Text. ![]() There are several ways to implement a PLC program state diagram.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |